//COMMUNICATIONS
Tuesday June 22, 2010, 12:05
Most people don't really understand where I'm coming from when my eyes burn and I tell them, "I've got to get the hell out of Chicago." After all, this isn't a bad city at all. It's not too expensive, I've got a great studio here, and I know some amazing artists in town who I can pal around with. I have connections here, and I have friends and family here. I just had a show of my work this spring and tons of people came - why would I want to leave?
Because Chicago isn't an artist's city.
It's not that artists can't live or create great work here, but their
art careers certainly aren't going to go anywhere if they confine
themselves to the Chicago city limits. In order to be shown at one of
the better galleries in town (note: there are no great galleries in
town) they must belong to a very small clique of individuals that
graduated from one of three academic art programs here (although if you
don't have an MFA, God help you). So we're talking about a VERY small
number of artists here that are accepted as such. They all know each
other, they all support each other, and they all ostracize anyone who
isn't in their clique. Here's the really fucked up thing, though:
Despite having spent an insane amount of time and money on art school,
not a single one of them has any real artistic skill. They can talk your
ear off with big words and run art theory circles around you, but in
the end, their actual ART is crap because they were never taught how to
make art, they were taught about art theory. That's okay, though because
their main objective isn't to make great art, it's to climb the art
world ladder. So, in summary, the Chicago art world consists of a small
number of emperors, all wearing no clothes.
The gallery owners here know the professors and help to promote the grad
students when they graduate; it's a closed system, and I have no chance
of breaking in. Besides that, my art isn't trendy enough, and it's too
aesthetic. I don't deal with all of the conceptual drivel that the
emperors were taught in school, so my art isn't relevant here. If I
remain in Chicago, I will always remain on the sidelines, showing at
alternative spaces, garden walks and cafés, and never allowed to play
with the big kids.
And aside from all of that, there are other big problems for an artist
living in Chicago.
People who live in Chicago don't buy art. This is a town of hard working
people who don't have time for culture. We go to the bar, we watch the
game, we drive our cars, we go to the movies... we don't buy fine art.
And the tiny handful of eccentrics with deep pockets that do, certainly
aren't going to buy a piece from the guy down the street, they're going
to get their art from New York or L.A. or London or Berlin, because then
it's For Real. And really, who can blame them, with all the nude
Chicago emperors running around calling themselves artists? I wouldn't
want to buy art here either if I didn't know better. But the bottom line
is this: if you're an artist living in Chicago, you're either showing
your work in New York or LA, or you have a day job you're never going to
give up.
I've seen what this town has done to world class artists who have tried
to stick it out here and make things work, and I'm getting the hell out
now. Why Berlin? Well, why not. I don't see myself living in either L.A.
or New York, so I'm looking to other parts of the world. London's
expensive, and Paris doesn't interest me. I love Germany, I love Berlin,
and I feel at home there more than any other city in the world aside from
Chicago, so Berlin it is. People tell me the art scene isn't what it was
10 years ago, but that's no reason to give up and remain in a city that pushes me to the sidelines. I refuse to be overlooked because I didn't
spend $100K on an art education that doesn't teach anything about how
to make art, and I refuse to grovel at people's feet and beg them to
accept me and let me join their awful little clique.
While I'm sure Berlin
will have it's own issues, and I can't imagine they'll all great me with
open arms and a red carpet, it's at least an international cultural hub
with a lot of stuff going on. Chicago will never be culturally relevant
as long as a the ruling clique continues to squash original thought and
look to bigger cities to give it cues. It's turned into a city of
ambitious imitators, one of which I could never be a part.
|
You just didn't sleep with the right people... Seriously...
It's hard for a lot of people to break into the art scene and be labeled "relevant"...even if you have an MFA. The alumni you speak of learned that theory to discuss, analyze, and reflect on their work, to truly investigate the "work", to bullshit their way into galleries, to rationalize why they don't know how to paint or draw or whatever, and to validate themselves as "authentic" artists. I should know, I'm one of them. (And I plan on getting an MFA)
I took important classes like: The Art of the Hustle, Bullshitting 101, How To Seduce Your Professor (lab), Who You Know(lecture), and many other valuable courses.
What's important is that your work stays relevant to you.
You're making the right move by moving. The distance will give you an opportunity to gain a new perspective on your work.
Good luck.